2026

Humanities Stakeholder Claims About the Humanities: Dataset and Topic Models

16 Jan 2026; rev. 12 Sept 2026 (Dataset date: 11 Nov 2025)

Overview

This dataset of what humanities stakeholders say the humaniites are and do, and why they are valuable, accompanies my article, “Unspeakable Humanities: Planning for Restructuring the Humanities,” forthcoming in a special issue of Modern Fiction Studies on “Forseeable Humanities Futures.” The dataset and my topic models of it (see contents) consists of 742 brief, unique quotations from 692 different sources (see Excel spreadsheet all_quotes.xlxs). These are grouped in 11 source sets—ten sets (#1-10) holding quotations about the humanities by stakeholders of different sorts, and, for comparison, one set (#11) with quotations about the arts by higher ed arts institutions and programs:

  1. higher education institutions, divisions, or programs
  2. humanities centers
  3. major humanities funders
  4. humanities professional associations (such as the MLA or AHA)
  5. humanities councils (US state and other jurisdictional humanities councils)
  6. university and college alumni magazines (focusing on articles about the humanities)
  7. “humanities-plus” or “humanities+” higher-education programs (e.g., environmental humanities, medical humanities, legal humanities, or digital humanities, urban humanities, energy humanities)
  8. public humanities programs and initiatives
  9. applied or practical humanities programs
  10. the GLAM sector (galleries, libraries, archives, museums)
  11. higher-ed arts institutions and programs (art, design, performing arts)

Included with this dataset is documentation of my data collection process. Also included is a topic model of the humanities quotations (explore) and a topic model of the arts quotations (explore)—including Mallet topic model data files, and interactive web pages and visualizations for examining the models.

Key parts of this resource are available directly here on my personal website–including readme and other documents, HTML pages, and the all_quotes.xlsx spreadsheet with my cumulative data. (See links in the table of contents table below.) However, other materials such as .csv files and Mallet topic model data files are only available by downloading this resource as a package in a .zip file deposited for permanence in the open-data Zenodo repository (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21301673). (I do not also put the kit in a GitHub repository because some data exceeds GitHub file size limits.)

Dataset Contents

Download all parts as a single .zip file here (2.09 Mb). Selected parts of the kit are directly accessible from links in the table below:

Folder# Description Primary Items in Folder

(Links go to materials on alanyliu.org website. For full kit, with all data, download the .zip file)
Format(s) Tips for the General User
0
readme
  • main readme file for this dataset resource
.docx
1
data collection documentation
.docx
2
dataset
  • 10 source sets of definitional statements on the humanities from stakeholders
  • 1 source set of definitional statements about arts education from higher-ed arts institutions and programs
  • cumulative spreadsheet of quotations in Excel format
.cvs, .xlxs
This folder is the main payload of this resource. Readers interested in what humanities stakeholders typically say in their definitional statements about the humanities can browse through the spreadsheets. Each sheet contains verbatim quotes with abbreviated source metadata.
3
topic models
  • Mallet data files and interactive web pages for exploring two topic models: a 20-topic model of humanities quotations, and a 10-topic model of arts quotations
.mallet, .gz, .xml, .txt, .html
For the general reader, the interactive web pages named “interactively_explore_topics.html” in this folder will be the most useable for gaining a sense of the topic models. (The pages are linked live here on my personal website, but can also be downloaded as standalone HTML pages to be opened in a local browser. The pages are also included in the .zip file for for this whole resource.)

Notable Limitations of Dataset

As explained in my “Unspeakable Humanities”  article:

There are more stakeholder statements that could be collected. In principle, I could also mine scholarly works and social media. I started on both the latter, but for the present stopped because of access and other problems impeding algorithmic harvesting at scale. Problems included: proprietary platforms, ethical and privacy issues related to social media, and paywall problems in the case of scholarship. Also, in these venues it is difficult algorithmically to winnow large numbers of stakeholder statements from other kinds or statements, or, in scholarship, from complex blends of critical, historical, theoretical, and other standpoints.

Quotations from humanities and arts stakeholders contained in my dataset remain under the copyright or license of their original sources, and are included here as brief excerpts under fair use doctrine.  Non-consumptive use data about, and data models of, these materials that I have created (such as topic models and web pages for exploring them) are published under a CC BY (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International) license.

Cite

How to Cite this Resource
  • As presented on my personal website: Alan Liu, “Humanities Stakeholder Claims About the Humanities: Dataset and Topic Models.” January 16, 2026. https://alanyliu.org/citation/humanities-stakeholder-claims-dataset/”
    This presentation of my resource includes documents, spreadsheets, live HTML pages with visualization interfaces, and other materials that can be accessed directly and individually downloaded or opened in a browser. However, the resource on my personal website excludes some data such as .cvs files and large topic model data files; and, of course, a personal website is not designed for archival permanence.
  • Full .zip archive (with all data) permanently deposited in Zenodo: Alan Liu, “Humanities Stakeholder Claims About the Humanities: Dataset and Topic Models,” Zenodo, 2026, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21301674.
    This zip file contains all data and documents in the resource.  If updated, the zip file will be versioned in Zenodo with separate DOI’s that can be cited individually if needed.

 

2025

Kit for Exploring Articles on AI Published in 2024

 

Kit Table of Contents Additional Technical Info Limitations of Kit Works Cited
Overview
Created Aug. 5, 2025;
rev. 17 April 2026

This is a digital kit for exploring a collection of 553 journal articles published in English in 2024 that mention “artificial intelligence” or “AI” in their titles. These include the 227 “highly cited” such articles of that year in the Web of Science Core Collection index; and the 326 articles on AI in the Web of Science Arts & Humanities Citation Index (AHCI) (as listed on Feb. 15, 2025). Note †

The kit accompanies my article “AI Virtue: What is Good Knowledge in the Age of Artificial Intelligence?,” Modern Fiction Studies (forthcoming). The kit is thus focused on providing ways to study the language of epistemic values in discussions of AI (terms characterizing and evaluating the quality of knowledge, and its knowers, swirling all around AI—e.g., true, reliable, accurate, precise, nuanced, original, creative, and myriads of others). But the kit’s topic models and word embedding models can also be used to study other features of the article sets.

The kit, whose parts are listed in the table below, may be downloaded as a package in a .zip file deposited in the open-data Zenodo repository (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19264354). (I do not also put the kit in a GitHub repository because some data exceeds GitHub file size limits.)

For convenience, I also make most of the kit’s web pages, documents, data, and other materials (excluding too-large data files) directly accessible here on my personal website; see links in table of contents table below. The kit contains only non-consumptive use data about, and data models of, articles. It includes no full texts of materials under copyright.

The kit is published under a CC BY (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International) license.

How to Cite this Kit
  • As presented on my personal website: Alan Liu, “Kit for Exploring Articles on AI Published in 2024,” Alan Liu (blog), 2025, https://alanyliu.org/citation/kit-for-exploring-articles-on-ai-published-in-2024
    This presentation of my kit includes live HTML pages with visualization interfaces and other materials that can be accessed directly and individually downloaded or opened in a browser. However, the kit on my personal website excludes some data such as large topic model data files; and, of course, a personal website is not designed for archival permanence.
  • Full .zip archive (with all data) permanently deposited in Zenodo: Alan Liu, “Kit for Exploring Articles on AI Published in 2024,” Zenodo, 2025, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19264354.
    This zip file contains all data and documents in the kit. If updated, the zip file will be versioned in Zenodo with separate DOI’s that can be cited individually if needed.
Kit Table of Contents

Many parts of the kit of interest to the general user are directly accessible from links below. For the entire kit, download the .zip file.

Folder Description Primary Item Types & Formats

(Links go to materials on alanyliu.org website. For full kit, with all data, download the .zip file)
Tips for the General User
0 “Readme” File (including overview, table of contents, statement of limitations)
Main Readme:
1 Article Lists: Bibliographies and spreadsheets of articles in my corpora of 553 English-language articles published in 2024 mentioning “artificial intelligence” or “AI” in their titles as identified in:

  • Web of Science Core Collection citation index (227 “highly cited” articles)
  • Web of Science Humanities Citation Index (AHCI) (326 articles)
Folder 1’s Readme includes an explanation of my search parameters in Web of Science.
Folder 1 Readme:
Bibliographies:
Article list spreadsheets with file numbers in my corpora:

The bibliographies are of most general use.

But the article list spreadsheets with file numbers in my corpora are helpful when consulting my topic model “summaries” (in folder 2), where top documents associated with any topic are keyed to my corpus file numbers. The spreadsheets also include details about citation sources in the Web of Science.

2 Topic Models:
Subfolders:

  • wos_core_topicmodel_22topics
  • wos_ahci_topicmodel_22topics
  • wos_ahci_topicmodel_40topics
Each subfolder contains a spreadsheet summarizing a topic model, the Mallet data files for the model, and DFR Browser 2 and pyLDAvis interactive visualizations of the model.
Folder 2 Readme(s):
Mallet data files:
Model summaries–spreadsheets with descriptive topic labels, top keywords, top docs:
Interactive visualizations:
Model summaries provide mid-level abstractions of the topic model data. They also include descriptive topic labels suggested by AI.
Interactive visualizations provide higher-level abstractions facilitating interpretation. I recommend the DFR Browser 2 visualizations to general users as the most intuitive and full-featured.

Animated gif showing the process of navigating through various views in Dfr Browser 2, including the gird overview (with circles representing topics), the topic view (with keywords and key articles), and others.

Animated gif of Dfr Browser 2. (Click links at left for actual Dfr Browser 2 views of topic models)
DFR Browser 2 is a Python tool by Scott Kleinman that builds on Andrew Goldstone’s original dfr-browser to create interactive presentations of Mallet topic models. Note ††
See “Guide to Topic Model Visualizations” for how-to’s and best practices for DFR Browser and pyLDAvis.
3 Word Embeddings: Interactive visualizations for exploring GloVe word embedding models fine-tuned on my corpora. Interface allows for finding nearest neighbors of words and analogies
Folder 3 Readme:
Self-contained Web pages that open locally in a browser (takes a minute to load):
Each subfolder also contains a separate word_vectors.txt file with the embedding data along with a model_parameters.txt file.
The visualizations of word embeddings are fun to explore. They will be gee-whiz for those new to embedding spaces, where words are placed according to mathematically high numbers of relations with other words—all simplified for visualization in 3D. Users can search in the interface for words and their nearest embedding neighbors.

Animated gif of custom-made interactive visualization of a GloVe word-embedding model fine-tuned on my corpora. At the center is a zoomable and rotatable word cloud whose nodes are individual terms in the embedding space. At the left is a panel for search for specific terms. At the right is a panel showing the nearest 10 embedding neighbors of a word that has been searched for.

Animated gif of visualization of word-embedding model. (Click links at left for actual model visualizations.)
I used Anthropic’s Claude AI to code the visualizations of the embedding data.
4 Glossary of Epistemic Values: Glossary of epistemic values (positive and negative) mentioned in my two corpora, with frequency statistics and lists of ten nearest word-embedding neighbors of each word.

Also: Interactive word-net graph visualizations of the WoS Core and WoS AHCI words in the glossary
Folder 4 Readme:
Glossary in spreadsheet form:
Glossary visualized as interactive word-nets:
The glossary spreadsheet is the most informative, but the web pages with interactive graphs are the most fun.
Animated gif of spreadsheet of epistemic values, showing columns of words and their nearest word-embedding neighbors for both my WoS Core and WoS AHCI corpora.

Spreadsheet of epistemic values

 

Animated gif of custom-made interactive word-net visualization of a the epistemic values (and nearest word-embedding neighbors) collected in my spreadsheet of such values in "Kit for Exploring Articles on AI Published in 2024". The main panel shows a zoomable network graph whose main nodes are epstemic values, and whose secondary nodes are word-embedding neightbors of those values. Zooming in reveals the specific words. Clicking on a node highlights the edges in the graph connecting them to their nearest embedding neighbors.

Animated gif of interactive word-net of epistemic values (& word-embedding neighbors). (Click links at left for the actual word nets
I used Anthropic’s Claude AI to code my “word-net” visualizations.
Disclaimer: The glossary is a prototype or proof-of-concept because currently its less than 200 terms represent a partial harvesting of epistemic values that can always be added to and revised.
Additional Technical Information

I gathered word counts and other corpus-linguistics statistics with the assistance of Antconc (Anthony, AntConc (Version 3.5.7)). Topic models were created using Mallet (Mccallum). Interactive visualizations of topic models were created using DFR Browser 2 (Kleinman) and pyLDAvis (Mabey). Word embeddings were created using GloVe (Pennington et al.), which I implemented with the assistance of Python scripts created for my custom purposes with the assistance of Claude Opus 4.0 and 4.1 (Anthropic). Interactive visualizations for exploring word embedding models and word-net graphs were made with Python scripts also created with the assistance of Claude Opus 4.0 and 4.1.

Limitations of Kit

This kit is a prototype proof of concept developed for my article “AI Virtue: What is Good Knowledge in the Age of Artificial Intelligence?,” which suggests how to map the discourse of epistemic values swirling around generative AI (Liu).

A fully developed kit of this sort would be based on data from many more research articles and other materials discussing AI, and would require more fully evolved tools and collaborators from different fields. The limitations of the present kit include the following:

  • Corpus design: I used highly cited articles from the Web of Science (previously called “Web of Knowledge”) Core Collection index to get a broad sample of articles across domains and disciplines; and then I took another sample just from the Arts & Humanities Citation Index included as a subset of the WoS Core Collection so that I could compare humanities and arts articles, a key domain context for my discussions of creativity, against the most highly cited articles in fields like medicine and business (among which humanities and arts articles would otherwise be a slim minority). A different project that would be just as interesting, but not one I have undertaken (at least not yet), would be to design a corpus that includes highly-cited articles from both the Web of Science’s Core Collection index and its relatively new Preprint Citation Index. That would allow me to compare the broad sample of discussions of AI against preprints in arXiv and elsewhere, which are skewed toward technical or other specialized fields or, even when originating from or intended for the humanities and arts community, are characterized by technically advanced approaches in the digital humanities, cultural analytics, new media studies, and so on. This would make sense, for example, if one wanted to see what the gap or lag is between the broad sample and research at the leading edge of AI research. (My thanks to Richard Jean So for prompting this line of thought. He pointed out that preprints, as opposed to published articles, are the leading edge of research on AI.)
  • Date, language, and other constraints: A limitation of this kit is that it models data from only hundreds of articles published in a single recent year—not many thousands of articles from many years. It also deals with articles only in English, and articles only from research journals. Each of these constraints has implications for what can, and cannot, be inferred from using the kit. For example, the kit would ideally model many years of materials to allow for longitudinal study of the discourse of epistemic value before and after the advent of LLMs. And it would also ideally use at least one broader or different set of materials (e.g., articles randomly chosen from research on any topic) as a reference corpus allowing for “keyness” analysis (as corpus linguistics calls it) of statistically unique words in materials about AI.
  • In-progress “Glossary”: Another limitation is that in reporting on epistemic values, I harvested terms for a glossary (kit folder 4) that is always in progress and thus only partial. More terms can be added. And more forms of each term can also be added, based on systematic sifting of “word families” (see Bauer and Nation; Anthony, WordFamilyFinder, Ver. 1.0.1). In additional stages of work, we would also want to edit the terms to cull, consolidate, standardize, and otherwise edit based on systematic methods of qualitative analysis, ideally in collaboration with many domain experts across fields.
  • No user access to full texts: Copyright restrictions prevent me from including in the kit of any tool or data that contains full text from articles. The kit contains only “non-consumptive use” data such as word lists, statistics, or embedding parameters.
  • Pre-processing and processing decisions: the kit builds in interpretive and technical judgement calls I made at many levels—e.g., assumptions about how to preprocess texts to deal with compound phrases, named entities, and acronyms (I converted “artificial intelligence” and/or “AI” to “artificialintelligence,” for instance); what to add to a stopwords list of too-common words and proper nouns; how to balance optimization criteria in choosing the number of topics in topic models; which word embedding method to use (ultimately, I implemented a GloVe word embedding “fine tuned” on my WoS article sets); which similarity measure to use for finding nearest embedding neighbors (I chose cosine similarity), and how to avoid “over-fitting” to specific studies or language habits in the research journals.

The kit is a prototype that would benefit from improvement by others more seasoned in natural language processing, applied linguistics, and other fields who may wish to adapt it, or create their own version, for studying larger, more various corpora related to AI.


Notes

†      (← back)

Web of Science’s Core Collection contains its AHCI index as one of its component subsets of citation indexes. As of Feb. 15, 2025, when I consulted Web of Science to establish the list of articles to study for my research, none of the articles on AI published in 2024 on AI that the Core Collection flagged as “high cited” were also in the AHCI index. However, lthe Core Collection index latter added a few AHCI articles to its “highly cited” list (e.g., 10 articles as of Sept. 1, 2025).

††      (← back)

My thanks to Scott Kleinman for early access to his DFR Browser 2, and for making the DFR Browser 2 visualizations of the topic models in my kit. These visualizations may be opened in a browser from my website through the links in this kit. But for users downloading my kit from its permanent, full-data deposit as a .zip file who wish to run the DFR Browser 2 visualizations locally on their computer, the procedure is as follows (requires the ability to run the Python script included here with DFR Browser 2, or to use other means in a command-prompt window, to start a local web server [localhost] on a computer):

  1. Open bash on a Mac, or a command prompt, Powershell, or other command terminal in Windows that has access to Python.
  2. Navigate to the folder containing the index.html file of the DFR Browser 2 of the desired topic model. (“cd [path to folder]”)
  3. Run: “python server.py” to start a local web server (the server.py script is included in the folder)
  4. Open a browser to “localhost:8000”, which will show the DFR Browser 2 visualization running in the local web server.

Alternatively, users can upload the DFR Browser 2 folders in my kit to an online web server (e.g., to their own website).


Works Cited

 

1996
Oldies But Goodies

The Canon and the Web (with Laura Mandell)

An early conference panel Web site that I built with Laura Mandell for the session on “The Canon and the Web: Reconfiguring Romanticism in the Information Age” at the MLA convention in Washington D. C., 29 December 1996. In his paper titled “Distant Mirrors and the LAMP” at the MLA convention in 2013, Matthew G. Kirschenbaum has discussed this site as an early “distant mirror” of the later web in its attempt to “situate the session amid a thick contextual network,” its “clear desire for interactivity, as expressed through the live email links and the injunction to initiate correspondence,” and its “curatorial sensibility.”

Date of site: 26 March 1996.
Date of event: 29 December 1996.

Canon and the Web Site    Go to site
1995
Oldies But Goodies

Many Wolves (Web Authoring Collective)

This was the digital version of a ham radio club I started on my campus in 1995 for faculty, graduate students, and undergraduates in several departments (including English and Art) who were early enthusiasts of Web authoring. Included our Web show, a tools page, a project proposal page, and inspiration from Deleuze and Guattari.

“1995 calling 2013: transmission begins. . . .”

Date of site: 18 October 1995. (Earliest Internet Archive capture: 21 November 1996)

Many Wolves Web Authoring Collective
  • Many Wolves site (archival version of site as captured in Internet Archive, 21 November 1996)
1995
Oldies But Goodies

“Should We Link to the Unabomber? An Essay on Practical Web Ethics”

This is one of the earliest “blog” essays I wrote–so early that it preceded the era of blogs.

Citation: “Should We Link to the Unabomber? An Essay on Practical Web Ethics.” English Department, UC Santa Barbara, 9 October 1995. http://www.english.ucsb.edu/faculty/ayliu/research/whyuna.htm

Excerpt

Date: 9 October 1995

Background: The Emergence of the Unabomber Manifesto on the Net

Shortly after the publication of the Unabomber’s “Manifesto on Industrial Society and its Future” in the New York Times and Washington Post on Sept. 19, 1995, Time-Warner mounted the Manifesto on its Web server and made it available as a subpage (titled “Unabomber: Tightening the Net”) from its Pathfinder home page. The link to the full text of the Manifesto is accompanied on the “Tightening the Net” page by links to a variety of mainstream media stories and commentary as well as by updates on the FBI’s manhunt. Copies of the Manifesto have subsequently also appeared on other servers on the net.

The Issue: To Link or Not to Link From a Scholarly Research Page

The Manifesto, its context, and its reception are events of major interest to scholars in such fields as science-technology-and-culture, sociology, journalism, etc. This is all the more so because the distinctly academic style of argumentation and language in the Manifesto (which comes complete with the bomber’s endnotes) establishes an intense feedback loop or “reverb” with the academic institutions whose faculty and staff have been among the bomber’s favorite targets—and casualties.

Given the nature of the Manifesto’s original publication history, however (i.e., violently coerced), the ethics of participating to any degree in the further dissemination of the document is problematic. This is certainly the case if one were considering mounting a duplicate of the whole document on one’s server. But it is also the case, however attenuated and primarily symbolic, if one is merely considering creating a link to the document as it exists on someone else’s server.

In the broadest perspective, the Unabomber incident is a uniquely compelling test of the ethics of pure research. . . .


1995
Oldies But Goodies

Lyotard Auto-Differend Page

A “technical experiment and theoretical allegory” based on the work of Jean-François Lyotard. In this early attempt to explore the then-new dynamic capabilities of hypertext, I use now obsolete “client-pull” Web methods to create a series of automated tracks of Lyotard’s thought. The site includes a short theoretical essay on “philosophy of this page.”

Date of Site: August 1995.

Lyotard Auto-Differend    Go to site
1995
Oldies But Goodies

The Romantic Chronology (with Laura Mandell)

Co-edited with Laura Mandell, The Romantic Chronology was database-driven hypertext chronology of the Romantic period with a links-archive and other resources designed to provide a historically-organized introduction to online materials in the area. A “Philosophy of this Site” page includes theoretical essays by the editors as well as Rita Raley and Carl Stahmer (serving at that time as research assistants for the project).

The site started in 1995 as a series of large static HTML tables. Then, in 1999, the site became one of my first attempts to create a database-to-Web site (using Filemaker, though at this time I was also experimenting with other limited database programs such as Access before graduating to SQL Server and, later, to modern content management systems with LAMP architecture and MySQL databases).

By 2013, when Laura and I had long stopped developing or adding content to the site, the old Filemaker database (a problem for my English Department’s sysadmin to maintain) was retired. The site was “flattened” in static HTML form for archival purposes.

Date of site: 1995.

Romantic Chronology
1994
Oldies But Goodies

Ultrabasic Guide to the Internet

My primer for colleagues learning about the Internet. 124 pp.; “published” in bound form in 1994 and sold for $11 through my campus bookstore.

Date: 5 October 1994

  • Ultrabasic Guide to the Internet (full text as .pdf) (ported from a page-making program into PDF with some loss of elegance in formatting; bookmarks added to chapters)
  • Ultrabasic Guide to the Internet, windscreen metaphor image
    Ultrabasic Guide to the Internet, windscreen metaphor image

    My image from the guide illustrating the Internet as it appears through the “windshield” while driving on the information superhighway.

1994
Oldies But Goodies

The Voice of the Shuttle: Web Page for Humanities Research (VoS)

Original VoS       Current version of VoS

URL: http://vos.ucsb.edu
Role: Creator and editor (“weaver”).
One of the earliest humanities research portals. VoS began in 1994 as a 70+ Web-page directory of humanities research resources organized by field, historical period, author, etc. Its original mission was to seduce other humanities scholars onto the Web by showing them available online humanities materials. Vos was reimplemented in 2001 as a database-to-Web system allowing for dynamic views of the data (general to specific) and user contributions.

Suggested Citation: Voice of the Shuttle: Web Page for Humanities Research. Ed. Alan Liu. [Date of page when accessed, e.g., 27 September 2006]. University of California, Santa Barbara. Retrieved [Date of access, e.g., 27 September 2006]. <http://vos.ucsb.edu/>